January 20, 2014 § Leave a comment
Though I’m publishing this in January of 2014, I was indeed reading in October of 2013, and had intended to publish this back then. Let’s just say I have some catching up to do. I resolve to do better in the coming months.
In October, NPR reported that Charity Navigator will be changing its ratings formula. Already controversial with some nonprofits organizations, this change which will focus more on outcomes is causing even more leaders of charitable organizations to question the specific relevance of Charity Navigator’s metrics. Its one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t actually fit all organizations, especially when it comes to overhead costs.
Going directly against this grain, the Stanford Social Innovation Review (SSIR) published an opinion piece calling for the scrutiny of overhead costs of nonprofits to stop when it comes to measuring an organization’s effectiveness.
“Under the assumption that minimal administrative and fundraising costs mean a more effective nonprofit, donors frequently seek out organizations that spend the bulk of their funding on program expenses and only a small amount on overhead. But here’s the issue: We can’t separate a program from the people who develop and deliver it. To ensure that a program can achieve maximum impact, we must actively invest in the staff who are supporting the program and make sure we have the best people on the job.”
Amen to that, I say.
Helen Brown posted some useful fundraising analytics resources and guidelines for visualizing data. More of us in prospect development will benefit from learning to tell a story with our data.
The Nonprofit times published a piece raising concerns about collecting data and donor privacy. Really, this topic was old ten years ago. It’s a sensitive topic for me, and I’m tired of my profession, my respected colleagues, and my own professional practices being accused as having some kind of nefarious intent. We are not the NSA. We work with our organizations’ proprietary information stores, augmenting that with information that is publically available about our prospects. Not to mention the fact that we operate with the highest ethical standards outlined in the statements of ethics from the Association of Fundraising Professionals and the Association of Professional Researchers for Advancement. Prospect researchers are easy targets right now because privacy and information is such a hot-button issue in public discourse. Questioning the ethics of our profession is either ignorant or opportunistic, and I expect more from an industry journal.
Though this article goes back to July, I was reading it in October. The Chronicle of Higher Education published This heartening piece: The Ideal English Major. While being specifically about the English major, I read it as pertaining to a liberal arts education in general. The value of liberal arts is on the ropes during this economic downturn, and it’s about time folks in academia and those who have benefitted from a liberal education come forward in popular discourse to defend its value. This article offers some encouraging words and inspiration.
February 20, 2010 § Leave a comment
I live in a “transitional” neighborhood in Chicago, diverse in just about every way. Many different types of families, ethnicities, generations, and classes live withing close proximity. This poses many challenges as differences bump up against each other. So while I admittedly have not gotten to know many of my neighbors in the two years since we moved in, and none of them well, the community around me is important to me and I want to do what I can to support its improvement.
This involves having a general awareness of local politics and current events, supporting local business, attending arts events, and civic participation in general.
Since moving here, much of this has been facilitated for me by social media. There are many neighborhood blogs in and around Chicago, and The Uptown Update happens to be one of the best in Chicago. This blog has established itself as a primary source of information for residents.
I would really like to see more social media take off locally. I have been able to connect with a handful of people on Twitter and Facebook who live nearby, but I haven’t seen community members take full advantage of the tools with the intention of connecting with neighbors and community organizing. It seems to me that Twitter could be especially beneficial in terms of communicating up-to-the minute happenings to neighbors, whether it is a quickly developing situation like the riots that were happening here last summer, or people getting the word out about a town hall meeting.
So I have begun a lone one-woman effort (for the moment) to use a Twitter hash tag for my neighborhood: #ChiUptown. I use it when I’m out and about, patronizing local businesses, walking the dog, or when ever I have anything to say about goings-on in the ‘hood. I would love to connect with other locals this way. Hopefully it will catch on.
December 1, 2009 § 1 Comment
It is December 1, and though this promises to be a busy month, I am going to attempt to write one blog post per day. In December, the theme for NaBloPoMo is Mitzvah. While one doesn’t have to use the theme in order to participate, I like to think that this blog is about Mitzvah, or doing good deeds. Seems to be a good fit for me.
Let’s see if I will actually have the time, and more importantly, the discipline, to write at least one post every day.